Leadership, management style and communication - Programme Structure - Intended results - Relation to the Research School - Academic reputation - Effects of cooperation
Leadership, management style and communication
Het programma wordt geleid door de aan de Universiteit Utrecht verbonden onderzoeksleider Frederik Willem Grosheide en de aan de Universiteit Maastricht verbonden onderzoeksleider Anselm Kamperman Sanders, die de coördinatie van de werkzaamheden binnen het programma voor hun rekening nemen.
Vanuit de coördinatoren wordt regelmatig via e-mailcorrespondentie met andere onderzoekers overlegd over te ondernemen activiteiten, bijvoorbeeld gezamenlijke congressen of de te organiseren workshop op de jaarlijkse Ius Commune conferentie.
Daarnaast vinden regelmatig workshops plaats waaraan een groot deel van de bij het programma betrokken onderzoekers deelnemen. Alle onderzoekers binnen het programma treffen zich derhalve minstens éénmaal per jaar tijdens de jaarlijkse Ius Commune conferentie. Daarnaast wordt ook in het kader van vele onderzoeksprojecten samengewerkt, in welk kader ook workshops worden georganiseerd.
a. Summary and Contents of the research programme
Ever since its emergence in the late 19th century (Paris Convention 1883; Berne Convention 1886) intellectual property law in today's Information Society is by its very nature international in character. International in this respect means both transnational, reflected in legal instruments such as the TRIPS Agreement 1994 and the WIPO Copyright Treaty 1996, as well as European, evidenced in a host of legislation and court decisions within the EU and ad hoc bonds that surpass the EU such as the European Patent Convention 1975. Whereas both national and international intellectual property law traditionally focus on the economic interests of right owners (producers), in recent years the social and cultural aspects of intellectual property law, and as a consequence the interests of users (consumers and the public interest), have become prominent. This development is reflected in the first place by the ever more active role of UNESCO in this domain. Intellectual property law is now also placed in the perspective of protection, promotion and preservation of the cultural heritage of mankind. This development has induced other stakeholders and actors in the field such as WB and IMF, to also take the social and cultural impacts of intellectual property law into account. In this respect the Development Agenda for the World Intellectual Property Organisation 2004, together with the related so-called Geneva Declaration 2004, issued by civil society, can be seen as consolidating developments so far. As a consequence, today's intellectual property law is of a rather global nature.
However, the indicated state of affairs, on the international as well as on the European front, has led to a considerable fragmentation of actual intellectual property law. The lack of coherence and consistency of intellectual property law which follows from the indicated developments is the more pressing since the traditional conceptual framework of intellectual property law has also come under strain due to the technological changes which today's society is experiencing. From a European perspective all this is not only detrimental to furthering the internal market within the EU, but also requires a reassessment of the policy issues underlying actual intellectual property law. In this sense the programme takes a pivotal view of the EU's role as an actor in shaping international intellectual property policy, as well as a recipient, conduit and implementer of international intellectual property policy in its Member States.
The research programme aims to acquire a clear view of the feasibility and desirability of the harmonisation and unification of intellectual property law in Europe, more particularly the EU, taking account of the international agendas of WIPO, WTO and UNESCO in this respect. Proper attention will also be given to cultural constraints in general and the effect of the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity in the EU in particular. Intellectual property law in this respect has to be considered in a broad sense, not only referring to the traditional intellectual property law domains of copyright law and patent law but also encompassing communication and media law as well as the protection of cultural expressions and indigenous knowledge and that of cultural property. In that perspective the research will concentrate on the tension between intellectual property law seen from a proprietarian perspective and intellectual property law seen from a human rights perspective.
The research programme will contribute by means of Ph.D. theses (see the annexed overview) monographs, articles and conference papers to furthering and elaborating the study of both the foundations and the technical set-up of intellectual property law, all this within the perspective of a possible harmonisation or unification of substantive law. In doing so, the following steps will be taken: selecting, on the basis of an overview of substantive national intellectual property laws in the EU and the US, a number of sub-themes (e.g. copyright contract law, protection of cultural property, cross-border enforcement), that are most appropriate for being taken into account in this respect, bearing in mind the determining factors in the EU such as differences in national legal cultures and legal techniques; indicating whether and how harmonisation or unification with regard to the selected sub-themes can be attained, leading to proposals concerning issues where harmonisation or unification appears to be within reach.
Seminars will be organised on a regular basis so as to publicly communicate the developments in the research fields. Reporting on the activities of the research group (publications) will take place according to the capabilities of the participating faculties and individual researchers in the programme.
Teaching and dissemination of research is a strong feature of the programme. Many participants in the programme teach and lecture in advanced courses for professionals and post-graduate students in international networks in Europe and Asia, such as the European Intellectual Property Institutes Network and the IEEM Intellectual Property Law School (see under point 5 below).
The programme also has strong links with teaching at master level at Utrecht University and Maastricht University. This strengthens the research in this programme in the sense that dissemination, teaching and discussion in the classroom provides the participants in the programme with the opportunity to revisit, re-assess and fine-tune their research. Courses taught in Utrecht and Maastricht:
Since 2003 a common focus for this research programme on the role of IPR in regional and international integration processes has been found in the relation between intellectual property law and human rights. To highlight this theme a conference resulting in a special issue of the Molengrafica Series was organised on 3-4 July, 2006 ‘The Human Rights Paradox in Intellectual Property Law’ (http://www2.law.uu.nl/priv/cier/CIER%20Conference/index.htm). On the basis of this focus of the CIER lustrum conference more work was undertaken on the increasing societal awareness of the role and place of IPR in international economic development and the protection of cultural heritage. This was reflected by the substantial input from UU and Maastricht IP researchers to the conference ‘The Protection of Cultural Diversity from and International and European Perspective’, 18-19 March, 2007. Much of 2007 has been spent on collecting and editing of materials from the CIER lustrum conference of 2006. The publication with Edward Elgar is foreseen in an English language CIER series. Parallel to this elaboration on the research theme, a conference was organised in Maastricht around the inaugural lecture of Prof. Kamperman Sanders in 2005, which in part resulted in the publication of volume four in the Heath/Kamperman Sanders edited International Intellectual Property Law Series with Hart Publishing. Volume four is entitled ‘Intellectual Property and Free Trade Agreements’. Currently volumes five and six are being edited. These volumes will equally deal with the core issues of the research programme, covering: ‘Intellectual Property, Spares and Repairs’ and ‘Industrial Property and Pharmaceuticals’. Dutch law was covered by the CIER publication of the second and totally new edition of ‘Hoofdstukken Communicatie- en Mediarecht’, edited by Grosheide and De Cock Buning. The review period also saw the inaugurations of De Cock Buning in 2006 at the UU as extraordinary professor Media en Communicatierecht and Van Englen, also at the UU, in 2007 as extraordinary professor Overdracht en Licentiering van Technologie.
Progress has been made in bolstering the numbers and breath of expertise of the research group, especially in the years 2006-2007. More efforts are, however, necessary. Van Engelen will strengthen the ranks of the IP programme in future, and a new PhD candidate, Anke Dahrendorf (UM) has commenced work on a thesis dealing with ‘Intellectual Property Rights in International Trade and Investment: Multilateral versus Bilateral/Regional Options’. It is furthermore foreseen that non-residential staff teaching in the Masters IP and Knowledge Management and the EIPIN network can be brought on board. The inclusion of Prof. Jan Brinkhof, and Bas Pinckaerts, both from the UU, to the IP research group has already been put to the board of the board of the OZIC.
a. General nature
Modern IPR-law is an invention of the 19th century. It gained its actual shape not later than 1883 and 1886 when the Paris Convention and the Berne Convention were established. In those days IPR-law was part of the public debate and figured on the political agenda all over Europe. IPR-law was no longer a limited concept, relevant only to certain interest groups, as it had been for a long time previously. The explosion of mass culture coinciding with a rapid emergence of new technologies had thrust IPR-law into an environment where immense political, social, cultural and economic forces were operating. And although it was considered from the outset to be in the public interest that IPR-law should balance the interests of rights owners and society at large, this objective has not always been attained.
Since these early days things did not change very much during the largest part of the 20th century. The same issues still inflamed the public debate and dominated the political agenda, albeit in a more articulate way. An articulation that found its origin mainly in societal and technological developments leading to the transformation of the Industrial Society, into the Information Society. The societal developments that merit attention here are the advent of the welfare state, the increase in cultural participation and the establishment of new forms of entrepreneurial activities. The technological developments once and for all concern the exponential growth of the possibilities to produce IPR-protected material driven and dominated by the computer or biotechnology.
From the ipr-point of view, the advent of the information era within the ‘epistemic communities’ of ipr-law is seen as being at the roots of challenges facing ipr-law, there being basically three main problems:
A reply to these challenges is the development of a new field of legal comparative activity: the comparative research-based drafting of European principles on different fields of private law, Dutch as an intellectual property law.
Communication and media law comes into play here in as far as the interaction between copyright law and the freedom of expression is concerned.
b. Research subject chosen
Politico-legal aspects/Legal basis
Applicability and appropriateness
Relation to the Research School
As is clear from the description, this programme contributes to the central theme of the Ius Commune Research School in that it focuses on the role of IPR in regional and international integration processes thus highlighting its social and scientific relevance in relation to:
Although the general law of IPR has not been affected in all sectors of EU legislation, nevertheless there are by now several specific fields of law concerning IPR in which relevant EU legislation applies. The scope of this legislation is constantly developing as part of the gradual evolution of European Community Law.
The need, and as a consequence, the social and scientific relevance of the harmonisation and unification of intellectual property law in an international setting speaks for itself, taking into account the observations made above. It is particularly reflected in the drafting of inter-governmental and non-governmental legislative instruments such as EC Regulations and Directives or the WIPO Dispute Settlement Regulation as well as the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Justice and the WTO Dispute Settlement Body.
Furthermore the programme's innovative aspect is to approach the planning of IPR-law within the perspective of European integration with an integral approach. Ipr-law is seen as a coherent subsection of private law as regards to the underlying principles into which IPR-law is bound. A less frequented and more general view of the various bodies of IPR-law is therefore required.
In a more practical context all participating researchers are actively involved in the research programme of the Ius Commune Research School. Seminars have and will be organised on a regular basis so as to inform each other and other researchers about the developments in the research field. Reporting on the activities of the research group (publications) takes place according the capabilities of the faculty, the university and the research school.
Many researchers in this programme participate in international networks and publish in English language and peer reviewed journals or book series. Members of the programme have acted as rapporteur for various EC Commission Expert Group reports.
Furthermore there is cooperation and active participation in the European Intellectual Property Institutes Network (Queen Mary London, CEIPI Strasbourg, ETH Zurich, Magister Lucentinus Alicante, Max-Planck Institut Munich), the AHRB Copyright Research Network, Birkbeck University School of Law London, the AHRC Research Centre for Studies in Intellectual Property and Technology Law Edinburgh, and the Institute of European Studies of Macau Intellectual Property Law School.
Prof. A. Kamperman Sanders acted as Appraiser/Consultant for the EC Multilateral Trade Assistance for Cambodia in 2006, carried out by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ); training the sitting judiciary.
The inception of the Masters Intellectual Property Law and Knowledge Management (LL.M/MSc.) at the UM raises the profile even further, with the Stockholm Network pledging three grants of US$9000 each for outstanding students wishing to pursue post-graduate studies in IP Law.
Effects of cooperation
As can be seen from the achievements, cooperation has led to many projects, publications and conferences that would otherwise not have been possible, especially where it concerns access to and the ability to build international networks.
Prof. F.W. Grosheide is serving as member of the Vaste Adviescommissie Auteursrecht of the Dutch Ministry of Justice, as member of the Geschillencommissie Stichting ter Exploitatie van Naburige Rechten (SENA), as member of the Executive Committee of the International Association for the Advancement of Teaching and Research in Intellectual Property (ATRIP) and as a member of the Executive Committee of the Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI), in that capacity contributing to the organisation of several seminars and conferences worldwide. He also serves as member of the board of editors of Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclamerecht. In cooperating with the AHRB Research Center for Studies in Intellectual Property and Technology Law, University of Edinburgh, he has secured contributions from members of this research group to the 2006 CIER conference and the resulting book, and is acting as reviewer for the AHRB digital publication ‘SCRIPT’. He acts as member of an expert group on the Fundamentals of IP Contracts, led by the Max Planck Insitute in Hamburg.
Prof. M. de Cock Buning, is member of the executive of the Vereniging voor Auteursrecht and member of the board of editors of Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclamerecht. She was appointed as extraordinary professor Media- en Communicatierecht at Utrecht University in 2006. She acts as Arbiter, Domain name Dispute Resolution at the World Intellectual Property Organisation. In cooperation with the Ministerie OCW, Nederlands Uitgevers Verbond, Publieke Omroep, she is responsible for the Quickscan Crossmediale publiek-private samenwerking (April 2006).
Prof. A. Kamperman Sanders acted as initiator, academic director and convenor of the annual IEEM Intellectual Property Seminar over the course of several years in cooperation with the Institute of European Studies of Macau (IEEM), China. This has enabled participants to the programme to attend and act as speaker at the seminar. A book series published by Kluwer Law International and subsequently Hart Publishing has been firmly established as a result. This cooperation furthermore led to the inception of the IEEM Intellectual Property Law School in 2004. The aim of the IEEM IPLS is to provide advanced post-graduate teaching in European and International Intellectual Property Law, student and researcher exchange between Asia and Europe, and funding for PhD research. To this end the IEEM now acts as sponsor to a chair of European and International Intellectual Property Law at Maastricht University. He is member of the executive of the Vereniging voor Mededingingsrecht, member of the board of editors of Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclamerecht, and member of the advisory board of the Intellectual Property Quarterly. He has repeatedly acted as external reviewer of PhD research proposals/work in progress for researchers of the EIPIN network.
The CIER and the Faculty of Law at Maastricht University participated in a consortium on a European Commission project on the effect of software patents. The MERIT (Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology) was the consortium's administrative beehive. The project was successfully completed in December 2007. The PhD thesis by Bakels on ‘Techniekbegrip in the Octrooirecht’ (to be defended early 2008) is in part a by-product of this project.